Support that starts quietly.

COURSE PROJECT · UX DESIGN

COURSE PROJECT · UX DESIGN

ROLE

UX DESIGNER

UX RESEARCHER

UX DESIGNER

UX RESEARCHER

TIMELINE

FALL 2025 — WINTER 2026

4 MONTHS

FALL 2025 — WINTER 2026

4 MONTHS

TEAM

LAINIE HENDRICKS

MINWOO CHO

ASHLEY ZHANG

LAINIE HENDRICKS

MINWOO CHO

ASHLEY ZHANG

TOOLS

FIGMA

FIGJAM

FIGMA

FIGJAM

01 WHAT IS HUSKYHUSH?

CONTEXT

Many universities offer mental health resources. Many students still don’t use them.

HuskyHush explores how to reduce the emotional and structural barriers that prevent students from taking the first step toward support.

Rather than designing another resource directory, we focused on something more nuanced:

What if the real barrier isn’t access — but emotional safety?

PROBLEM

Students don’t seek support because reaching out feels overwhelming.

SOLUTION

A safer first step toward support

HuskyHush is an anonymous peer support platform designed to lower the emotional barrier to seeking help. By connecting students with certified peer supporters through private text sessions, the platform prioritizes emotional safety, autonomy, and gradual pathways to care.

02 THE RESEARCH

INTERVIEWS

Our team conducted three in-depth, 30-minute interviews to better understand how UW students perceive, find, and decide whether to use mental health resources on campus.

Affinity diagram synthesizing themes across interviews

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

I analyzed existing mental health platforms and campus resource hubs to understand how current products support resource awareness — and where they fall short.

We analyzed existing mental health platforms and campus resource hubs to understand how current products support resource awareness — and where they fall short.

Diagram comparing strengths and limitations of existing platforms

KEY INSIGHTS

  1. Students don’t know where to start.

Participants described UW’s mental health sites as confusing and unclear. Even when they searched for help, they weren’t confident they were in the right place.

  1. Therapy feels crisis-oriented.

Most students associated campus mental health services with severe situations like suicide hotlines. Many felt their stress was “not serious enough” to qualify for support.

  1. Peers feel safer than professionals.

Every participant said they turn to friends before considering formal counseling. Peer conversations felt more relatable, less intimidating, and emotionally safer.

DESIGN QUESTION

We initially were focused on broadly increasing awareness of mental health resources. After research, we narrowed our focus:

How might we design a collaborative, low-pressure platform that helps UW students confidently take the first step toward support?

Instead of building a better directory, we began exploring low-pressure entry points.

03 THE IDEATION

CONCEPT 1: ANONYMOUS PEER SUPPORT CHAT

Storyboard for concept 1

Description

A fully anonymous chat space where students can connect with verified peer supporters to discuss stress, academics, or personal challenges.

Why?

Students consistently said they turn to friends before professionals. An anonymous peer system could replicate that comfort while maintaining privacy and accountability.

Strengths

  • Low emotional commitment

  • Peer relatability with institutional credibility

  • Familiar text interactions

Weakness

  • Moderation and safety concerns

  • Potential misuse of anonymity

CONCEPT 2: INTERACTIVE RESOURCE MAP + BUDDY SYSTEM

Storyboard for concept 2

Description

A guided questionnaire that recommends campus mental health resources and pairs students with a trained “buddy” to help navigate appointments.

Why?

Students expressed confusion about where to start and uncertainty about which services fit their needs.

Strengths

  • Clear, personalized guidance

  • Connects digital discovery to physical services

  • Encourages follow-through

Weakness

  • Requires operational infrastructure

  • Higher coordination and staffing complexity

CONCEPT 3: IDENTITY/EXPERIENCE-BASED PEER WORKSHOPS

Storyboard for concept 3

Description

Small, facilitated peer groups matched by shared identities or experiences (e.g., international students, first-generation students, specific majors).

Why?

Students said they feel more comfortable opening up to people who can relate to their background and lived experience.

Strengths

  • Builds community

  • Reduces isolation

  • Supports belonging

Weakness

  • Requires trained facilitators

  • Physical location requirements add logistical overhead

SELECTED CONCEPT

SELECTED CONCEPT

Anonymous Peer Support Chat

After evaluating feasibility and emotional impact, we selected Anonymous Peer Support Chat.

While all three concepts addressed gaps in the mental health ecosystem, Concept 1 most directly targeted the core barrier:

The hesitation before reaching out.

  • Directly reduces stigma

  • Requires the lowest emotional commitment

  • Aligns with existing student behavior

  • Serves as a bridge to formal care

04 THE STRUCTURE

INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

We mapped the core flows before designing screens to ensure clarity and reduce cognitive load.

Primary goals

• Talk to a peer supporter
• Manage past and upcoming chats
• Discover campus events
• Maintain user privacy

Top-Level Navigation

  1. Find Peer Support

  2. Chatroom

  3. Profile

  4. Events

Information architecture diagram

05 INITIAL DESIGN

PEER SUPPORTERS

CHATROOM

PROFILE

UPCOMING EVENTS

06 CONCEPT TESTING

OVERVIEW

We conducted three 20-minute concept tests with UW students to evaluate clarity, desirability, and perceived intuitiveness of the first HuskyHush design.

Affinity diagram synthesizing themes across concept testing

KEY FINDINGS

  1. Users value peer-based support.

Participants responded positively to the anonymous peer model.

  1. Navigation required clearer structure.

Users wanted a more defined flow between browsing supporters, filtering options, and booking sessions.

  1. Commitment needed confirmation.

Participants expected reassurance after scheduling a session.

  1. Event exploration needed more detail.

Users wanted enough information to assess whether an event was relevant before committing.

07 SECOND ITERATION

WHAT CHANGED

  1. Created a dedicated filters screen to reduce clutter and support intentional matching

  2. Built a complete booking flow with time selection and optional notes to increase clarity and user control

  3. Added a confirmation screen to reassure users and reinforce commitment

  4. Created a detailed event page with date, time, location, and description to support informed decisions

FILTER

BOOK A CHAT

CHAT CONFIRMED

EVENT PAGE

08 INTERACTIVE PROTOTYPE

WHAT I DID

  1. Developed a lightweight design system including color, typography, spacing, and reusable components

  2. Styled key screens to reinforce emotional safety and clarity

  3. Prototyped core flows to test interaction logic

  4. Refined hierarchy to reduce cognitive load

SCREENS

FLOWS

Filter the list of peer supporters based on user's needs

Use the app to book an online text appointment with a peer supporter

Use the app to RSVP for mental health events on campus

09 REFLECTION

TAKEAWAYS

Designing for mental health means designing for hesitation.

• Emotional safety must be intentionally designed
• Clear structure builds trust
• Confirmation moments reduce uncertainty
• Peer relatability lowers stigma

This project strengthened my ability to translate research into intentional system decisions.

NEXT STEPS

Usability Testing
• Test core flows for clarity and confidence
• Identify friction in booking and event registration

Refinement → Final Product
• Iterate based on testing insights
• Polish visual system and interactions

Demo Video
• Capture end-to-end flows
• Demonstrate how structure reduces hesitation